Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ocean Township board hears strong pushback on proposal to end virtual public comment
Summary
Public commenters and several board members urged the Township of Ocean Board of Education to retain virtual (Zoom) public comment, citing accessibility and safety; the board said no policy change was presented and that any change would require two public hearings.
The Township of Ocean Board of Education faced sustained public opposition Thursday to any move to end virtual (Zoom) public comment at meetings. Parents and community members told the board that removing the remote option would reduce access to public discourse and limit participation by people balancing jobs, childcare and transportation.
"You all started it during COVID. It was a necessity," said Alex Hayes of Oakhurst during the public-comment period, arguing the district should continue the remote option and that the board should work with police and schools on student e-bike safety after recent crashes. "Can we please call in during Zoom?" Hayes asked, urging the board to retain remote spoken comment as an accessibility measure.
The comments drew follow-up public remarks from online participants who called for broader attention to academic improvement and student supports. An online commenter who identified himself as Jonathan Shubman praised the district’s response to a possible SNAP benefits disruption and urged the board to study school-improvement strategies including staff development and interventions on reading instruction.
President McCarthy responded to public concerns on the virtual-comment proposal, saying, "There is no change of policy presented at this meeting, and I welcome and appreciate the comments that we have received tonight from all members of our public." He repeated the board’s procedural requirement that formal policy changes must be brought with public notice and that any such change would need the two public hearings the board’s policy requires.
Board members debated a narrower administrative question raised in public comment — whether to remove typed, in-chat comments while retaining spoken virtual comments. Some trustees asked staff to consider operational issues, including staffing to monitor live chat during presentations and whether typed comments create mixed signals when the board is focused on an in-room presentation.
No policy change was adopted or placed on the agenda at the meeting. President McCarthy said he did not see sufficient appetite among trustees to move immediately to alter policy and emphasized that any change would return to the agenda for the required hearings.
The matter is likely to return for further discussion with explicit agenda notice if the board decides to pursue revisions.
