Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivision Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission discusses subdivision ordinance Part 1: condo review, CSM limits and parkland fees
Summary
Middleton commissioners reviewed Part 1 of a proposed subdivision ordinance, debated whether the city should review condominium plats (preferring limited public-works review of utilities rather than full city review), kept a limit of up to four parcels on CSMs, and discussed parkland dedication versus fees with citation of Wis. Stat. 236.45(6)(c).
The Plan Commission discussed Part 1 of a proposed subdivision ordinance on Aug. 12, focusing on three policy issues: city review of condominium plats, limits on Certified Survey Maps (CSMs), and parkland dedication/fee-in-lieu language.
Staff noted that state law and county review typically govern condominium plats and cautioned that if the city took over condo review it would need to assume more comprehensive responsibilities. Commissioners largely agreed they did not want the commission to assume full condo-plat review authority; instead they recommended that condo documents or plats be submitted to public works so the public-works director can review utilities and sewer-lateral requirements.
On CSM parcel limits, commissioners and staff discussed whether to permit more than four parcels on a CSM to facilitate townhouse development; the commission opted to keep the limit at four parcels so that larger multi-parcel projects would go through subdivision plat review, which provides more thorough review of access, landscaping and traffic impacts.
The commission also discussed parkland dedication and fees. A commissioner read Wisconsin Statutes 236.45(6)(c) to confirm municipalities may offer either land dedication consistent with the plan or payment of a fee in lieu, and staff explained differences between parkland and conservancy land programming that can affect dedication acceptability.
No ordinance was adopted at the meeting; staff will incorporate commission feedback into the draft for later review and public committee circulation.
