Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Appearance Commission denies sign and storefront alterations at 100 South Pollock Street

December 16, 2025 | Selma, Johnston County, North Carolina


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Appearance Commission denies sign and storefront alterations at 100 South Pollock Street
The Thomas Selma Appearance Commission on Dec. 15 denied a certificate of appropriateness for 100 South Pollock Street, rejecting a proposal to add two wall signs and glass paneling to two garage doors for a proposed liquidation storefront.

Commissioners said the proposed signs and storefront alterations did not fit the special character of the historic district and that materials and details were insufficiently specified. Chair, leading the findings discussion, said, “I would definitely say it's inconsistent,” and commissioners questioned whether the application’s unspecified choice of wood or metal and the proposed lighting met the district’s standards.

Staff presented renderings and said the requested sign faces would be 10 by 4 feet and 16 by 4 feet with minor rear illumination and that two garage openings would receive glass panels to improve retail visibility. Commissioners accepted the testimony and evidence into the record and then moved through the required findings of fact. On the finding that the proposed change was consistent with the district’s special character, the body concluded the work was inconsistent.

On a motion to deny the certificate of appropriateness (moved by Miss Gaskell and seconded by Miss Smith), the commission voted by voice to deny the request. The minutes show commissioners voiced concerns about the signs appearing more like advertising for a flea‑market operation than signage compatible with nearby downtown historic signage.

The record does not include a subsequent formal resubmittal timeline; staff and commissioners discussed next steps generally but did not record a specific schedule for a revised application.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep North Carolina articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI