The Coventry Town Council debated and ultimately rejected a proposed forensic audit of legal invoices that would have authorized CLA (CliftonLarsonAllen) to examine billing records for up to $50,000.

Proponents argued an independent forensic accounting review was needed to determine whether irregular billing, double billing or other problems exist and whether the matter should be referred to the proper authorities. Several council members said an external auditor could provide an authoritative, defensible review and quickly determine whether further action was needed.

Opponents raised three central objections: (1) the town’s finance director and solicitor should first conduct an internal review before spending taxpayer funds; (2) CLA’s proposed rates and $50,000 cap were high without an RFP comparison; and (3) litigation and legal costs arising from a deeper investigation could multiply the expense beyond the $50,000 audit budget. Council members asked for and discussed weekly progress updates and lower interim spending caps, but the proposed resolution remained as introduced for vote.

Outcome: On roll call the resolution authorizing CLA (not to exceed $50,000) failed; council indicated an intent to explore alternative procurement options (including a possible mini‑bid or MPA listing) and to return the matter to a future agenda with more detail.

Why it matters: The motion was tied to earlier concerns about redacted invoices and the RDA's use of legal counsel; whether or not to use taxpayer funds for an external probe split the council and public commenters. The failure leaves open administrative and possible investigatory next steps.

What’s next: Council members discussed lower‑cap options, weekly check‑ins, and the possibility of issuing a faster procurement rather than an immediate award. The manager indicated staff would review procurement options (MPA, RFP) and bring recommendations back to the council.