Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Conflict Of Interest Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
High Point committee forwards amendment to allow city employees to receive housing and community development aid
Summary
The City of High Point Community Development Committee voted to forward an amendment to the city's conflict of interest policy that would allow city employees to receive assistance through community development and housing programs, with staff saying employees would meet the same eligibility rules and receive no special treatment.
Get email alerts on the Conflict Of Interest Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The City of High Point Community Development Committee on Tuesday moved to forward an amendment to the city's conflict of interest policy that would permit exceptions allowing city employees to receive assistance under community development and housing programs.
Nina Wilson, Community Development and Housing Director, told the committee the amendment "authorizes exceptions to our current policy that will allow city employees to receive assistance under community development and housing programs." She said the proposed language was attached to the meeting agenda and stressed that employees would "still have to follow any of the same rules" as other applicants, would meet the same criteria, and would not receive "any special treatment or consideration" or nonpublic information.
Chairperson Tyrone Johnson said he was pleased to see the proposal and called for a motion to forward it to the full City Council for final consideration. A committee member seconded; committee members present voiced "Aye," and the motion was forwarded to the full council. The transcript contains no individual roll-call votes or named vote tallies for the motion.
The amendment was presented as agenda item 2025-487. Committee members present at the meeting were Chairperson Tyrone Johnson, Councilman Tim Andrew and Councilwoman Vicky McKeever; Councilman Chris Williams was noted as not present. The committee described the meeting as short and recorded no substantive questions or requests for changes to the proposed policy during discussion.
The committee adjourned after the vote. The full City Council will consider the amendment in a future meeting; the transcript does not record a date for that consideration.

