Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Panel considers McCollum appeal alleging denial of counsel and prejudicial unredacted records

Judicial - Appeals Court Oral Arguments · December 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Defense counsel Justin Dashner told the appeals panel Greg McCollum lacked meaningful counsel for about a year and that unredacted medical records and limits on a head-injury expert prejudiced his OUI defense; the Commonwealth countered that warnings and later colloquy addressed waiver concerns. Decision pending.

An appellate panel heard argument in Commonwealth v. Greg McCollum as defense counsel argued that several systemic errors—including an effective yearlong denial of counsel, admission of unredacted medical records showing a "second offense" OUI, and limits on a head-injury expert—combined to prejudice the defendant's trial.

Justin Dashner, representing McCollum, opened by saying the proceedings "broke down the minute he was denied the right to counsel." He said the defendant spent roughly a year without meaningful representation during…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans