Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Appeals court hears dispute over abusive‑process verdict and trial evidence in Ladd v. Bosch
Summary
The Appeals Court considered whether testimony about legal fees and a trial‑generated invoice improperly influenced an abusive‑process verdict and damages. Appellant counsel said a document used at trial was hearsay and unreliable; respondent counsel argued testimony and alternate evidence were admissible under controlling precedent and that the abusive‑process and consumer‑protection theories were supported by the record.
The panel heard argument in David Ladd v. Alina Bosch over whether the trial court erred in admitting testimony tied to a document Giordano called a trial‑generated invoice and whether the abusive‑process and related damages determinations should stand.
Philip Giordano, counsel for the appellant identified in the transcript as representing Alina Bosch, criticized the trial proof of damages. He told the court the document shown to a witness during trial was not an ordinary…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
