Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Appeals panel reviews exit-order and frisk after motor-vehicle stop in impounded juvenile case
Summary
In an impounded juvenile appeal, counsel challenged an officer’s exit order and subsequent frisk; defense urged passenger-specific suspicion and noted disputed body-cam findings, while the Commonwealth defended officer safety and reasonable suspicion. Court took the matter under advisement.
The panel next heard an impounded juvenile appeal challenging an exit order and a subsequent pat frisk after a motor vehicle stop. Youth counsel Joseph Schneiderman argued the trooper lacked passenger‑specific suspicion and that the motion judge’s factual findings — particularly about bulges observed on body camera — are clearly erroneous.
Schneiderman…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
