Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Property Sale topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board reviews Salleysburg subdivision map and considers private sale of parcels

Jersey Shore Area School District Board of School Directors · November 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Administrators presented a proposed subdivision of the Salleysburg property and recommended the board consider authorizing a private sale path in January pending township approval; the parcel set includes an 11-acre ball-field parcel, a 17-acre building parcel, and an 11-acre 'perk-tested' lot with sanitary-sewer limitations noted.

Administration presented two documents to trustees showing proposed subdivision lines for the Salleysburg property and reviewed three sale options: public auction, sealed bids, or private sale. Administration recommended the board authorize intent to pursue a private sale at the January meeting after township feedback expected in December so district staff could meet proposed buyers, negotiate terms and return to the board for final approval.

The map shown to the board described three principal parcels: roughly 11 acres containing ball fields and parking, a 17-acre parcel containing the building and its immediate grounds, and an approximately 11-acre parcel that has passed a percolation test and was described as suitable for a mound-style sanitary system (‘‘perk-tested’’). Administration noted a small sanitary-sewer installation area tied to Lot 2 that would transfer with that lot, and said some low-acreage ground across the road contains the creek and would be handled accordingly.

Administration explained the private-sale pathway can require county-judge review and an appraised value if the judge’s authorization is needed; sealed bids preclude conversation with bidders while a private sale would permit negotiation prior to board approval. A board member pointed to a sentence in the sale memo about how proceeds ‘‘shall be used for debt service or capital reserve’’ and asked for clarity; administration confirmed proceeds would be restricted to district finance uses such as debt service or capital reserve, and said precise language would be prepared for a future agenda.

No formal disposition or sale was voted at the meeting; administration recommended next steps (township review in December, possible January action to authorize private-sale negotiations).