This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
The Salt Lake City Council voted to adopt an amendment to the city's multifamily zoning code that removes a 100‑foot maximum building length and increases the maximum number of dwelling units to 50 in the RMF 45 district.
Councilmember Darren Mano moved to adopt the ordinance and Councilmember Petro seconded; the measure passed on a 6–1 vote after council debate that included concerns about impacts on historic districts and parking.
Supporters framed the change as a remedy to an outdated zoning regime that limited housing supply. "This is the progressive smart policies that make our neighborhoods thriving," Councilmember Pui said, describing the amendment as part of a broader effort to permit more housing and address supply constraints. Councilmember Mano noted the long process of reform and described the change as a correction to a "broken" ordinance that had constrained multifamily development for years.
Opponents raised preservation and neighborhood-impacts questions. One council member said they would not support the measure because of possible effects on historic districts and parking, prompting discussion about mitigation and design standards.
What the ordinance changes: The adopted text amendment eliminates the 100‑foot maximum building length in RMF 45 and raises the cap on dwelling units in that zone to 50, altering the RMF 35/45 multifamily framework in Title 21 (the city's zoning code). Council members and staff said the amendment is intended to create more predictable and flexible options for multifamily development and to allow projects that better meet housing demand.
Next steps: The ordinance takes effect according to the city's normal ordinance-implementation schedule and will be applied to future multifamily development proposals in RMF 35 and RMF 45 zones. Councilmembers asked staff to monitor parking and historic-district impacts and to report back on implementation and any necessary follow-up measures.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,047 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund within 30 days if not a fit