Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the ERP Replacement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Eustis reallocates $375,000 from sales‑tax fund to hire ERP consultant; commissioners split on funding source
Summary
The commission approved a $375,000 reallocation from a sales‑tax capital fund to the general fund to pay for an ERP advisory process and authorized a $137,000 consultant contract; commissioners split on whether sales‑tax funds should have been used and expressed concern about total program cost.
The City Commission approved a budget amendment (resolution 25‑94) to move $375,000 from the sales‑tax capital projects fund into the general fund to pay for an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) advisory effort, and then approved a procurement (resolution 25‑95) to hire an ERP advisory consultant at roughly $137,000 plus travel.
Finance (Miss Lisa) explained the county sales‑tax oversight board had questioned whether subscription‑based software or consulting fees meet the statute's capital expenditure definition and said staff recommended using the general fund to avoid dispute. She described the consultant's work as a two‑part evaluation: business‑process mapping across departments and market analysis of software vendors.
Commissioners exchanged concerns about cost, whether the city had earlier discussed sales‑tax eligibility with the oversight board, and whether $1M budgeted in prior years would be sufficient to replace the current financial system (Edmonds). Miss Lisa said staff will pursue a legal opinion to seek county reconsideration about eligibility of subscription‑based IT assets.
The motion to reallocate $375,000 carried with recorded dissent (Commissioner Asbodie/Aspadi voted no; Vice Mayor Ashcraft voted no). The procurement for the consultant carried on a separate vote with at least one recorded no vote; commissioners emphasized that hiring the consultant does not commit the city to a software purchase and that the consultant is intended to guide any future procurement.
Next steps: the consultant will interview departments, map processes, recommend vendor options or confirm that the existing system (Edmonds) is sufficient, and return findings to the commission. Staff will pursue additional legal guidance on whether the county oversight board can treat subscription software as an eligible capital asset.
