Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning And Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge limits on in‑family conveyance and ask for planning data
Summary
Two residents told the fiscal court they want stronger farmland-preservation measures, more transparency on planning study results, and clarification about accessory-dwelling rules affecting farmworker housing; county officials said planning staff will make the public-comment record available and aim for committee review on Dec. 9.
Two Woodford County residents used the public‑comment period to press the fiscal court for clearer limits on development and for data to inform zoning changes.
James Mansfield, who identified himself as a resident south of the Bluegrass Parkway, said farmland preservation and traffic on narrow roads topped neighbors’ concerns. Mansfield told the court he feared unchecked growth and said “the fact that there are 1,700 something lots approved that could be built on is really, really a concern,” urging limits on how many parcels can be created through in‑family conveyance.
Steve Mullins, a county landowner and regular meeting attendee, asked for the growth‑study results discussed at a recent planning and zoning session and argued the county should not move forward before the study is posted. Mullins also asked whether the draft accessory‑dwelling‑unit (ADU) language — which includes a provision limiting an ADU to no more than 50% of the principal residence’s floor area — would apply to housing provided for farm labor or H‑2A workers.
Presiding officer and staff response: The presiding officer told residents the planning office is compiling the full public‑comment record for the in‑family conveyance text amendment to Articles 2 and 7 and that staff plan to provide the requested information and post it publicly. He said the item is likely to go to committee at the Dec. 9 meeting but added he would not proceed without the full record if it does not arrive in time.
Why it matters: The in‑family conveyance and ADU provisions affect how rural land can be divided and how housing for farmworkers and family members is provided, which has implications for farmland preservation, rural character and local infrastructure needs.
What’s next: County planning staff will post the record of public comments and additional information the magistrates requested and the court may consider the text amendment in committee at the Dec. 9 meeting.
