Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

County considers $4-per-employee administrative fee, staff to model $6 cap and phased rollout

December 09, 2025 | Grand County Planning Commission, Grand County Boards and Commissions, Grand County, Utah


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

County considers $4-per-employee administrative fee, staff to model $6 cap and phased rollout
Grand County commissioners on Dec. 8 directed staff to produce line‑item scenarios for an administrative fee charged against restricted funds, starting at $4 per employee per hour and capped at $6 during rollout, to help close a roughly $1.4 million general‑fund shortfall.

The proposal — explained by county finance staff and administrators during the budget workshop — would assess departments that draw on restricted (non‑general) funds for central administrative services. Staff presented two calculation methods: a full‑time‑equivalent hours approach (divide total hours countywide by 2,080) and a budget‑percentage approach; the two methods yielded totals within about $34,000 of each other in the staff’s examples.

Why it matters: commissioners are weighing a way to recapture a portion of expenses (attorney, HR, IT, procurement and similar central services) currently subsidized by property‑tax‑funded general fund accounts. Administration noted a rigorous, auditable formula is required: “The state auditor’s office has weighed in, and they have said that it is totally fine for general fund to offset those expenses,” a staff member said, while also saying the auditor requested a documented formula.

Staff estimates: at $4 per hour applied to the departments initially listed (sheriff, airport, library, weeds, Sand Flats and others), staff estimated gross revenue roughly $312,000 and a net improvement on the $1.4M deficit of about $167,000 after prior fees are accounted for. Staff also presented a 5‑year rollout option (50%, 65%, 80%, 95%, 100%) and said they can cap amounts for small entities.

Debate and equity concerns: commissioners pushed back on applying the fee only to a subset of departments, warning it could merely shift costs inside the general fund for departments that already receive general‑fund subsidies. One commissioner summarized the trade‑off plainly: “Either we reduce services or we increase the top line or both.” Several commissioners favored a per‑employee per‑hour approach for transparency; others asked for full mapping of restricted funds and potential unintended effects (for example, forcing general‑fund subsidies back to departments that also receive restricted revenue).

Next steps: staff (Quinn and finance team) will calculate updated totals for the $4/hour scenario with the departments shown on the screen and return with precise figures (including whether the current $1.55 existing fee was removed in prior iterations). Commissioners asked for alternate scenarios (e.g., $3, $3.50, $4, cap at $6, 5‑year phase in) to be presented at the next meeting.

The commission did not take a formal vote during the workshop; the $4/hour scenario was adopted as the working assumption to be modeled and returned for consideration.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Utah articles free in 2025

Excel Chiropractic
Excel Chiropractic
Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI