This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the
video of the full meeting.
Please report any errors so we can fix them.
Report an error »
The Tualatin City Council voted on Dec. 8 to adopt Resolution 5937‑25, affirming the Architectural Review Board's approval of the Land Research campus expansion (ARB 24‑0002) on Southwest Leviton Drive and related tax lots.
City attorney Kevin McConnell told the council the resolution contains three exhibits: the ARB's findings, the council appeal staff memo and the applicant's proposed findings. McConnell said the applicant's third exhibit initially included detailed noise‑standard language that drew community concern; the applicant submitted a redlined revision that removed the majority of those contested provisions. McConnell explained that including supplemental or alternative findings is a common legal strategy — "belt and suspenders" — to preserve the council's decision in the event of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) challenge. He said the council could voluntarily withdraw and refine findings if the matter is appealed.
An attorney for the applicant (Lam) described the supplemental findings as defensive and said the revisions were intended to address issues raised during public testimony and help the record withstand a potential appeal. A community member, identified as Mr. Hamilton, thanked the applicant for the revisions while urging the council to press the applicant on existing noise issues; city staff responded that a code enforcement investigation into ongoing noise complaints is underway and that the resolution does not preclude members of the public from lodging noise complaints.
Councilors and staff reaffirmed that the hearing was not reopened and that no new evidence would be accepted during the resolution vote. The council adopted the resolution and the revised exhibit submitted that afternoon; staff noted that if the matter is appealed to LUBA the council retains the ability to reconsider and modify the findings.
Ending: The resolution was adopted unanimously (roll call recorded as unanimous). Staff reiterated that community members remain able to file noise complaints with code enforcement and that an investigation is in progress.
View the Full Meeting & All Its Details
This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.
✓
Watch full, unedited meeting videos
✓
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
✓
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Search every word spoken in city, county, state, and federal meetings. Receive real-time
civic alerts,
and access transcripts, exports, and saved lists—all in one place.
Gain exclusive insights
Get our premium newsletter with trusted coverage and actionable briefings tailored to
your community.
Shape the future
Help strengthen government accountability nationwide through your engagement and
feedback.
Risk-Free Guarantee
Try it for 30 days. Love it—or get a full refund, no questions asked.
Secure checkout. Private by design.
⚡ Only 8,047 of 10,000 founding memberships remaining
Explore Citizen Portal for free.
Read articles and experience transparency in action—no credit card
required.
Upgrade anytime. Your free account never expires.
What Members Are Saying
"Citizen Portal keeps me up to date on local decisions
without wading through hours of meetings."
— Sarah M., Founder
"It's like having a civic newsroom on demand."
— Jonathan D., Community Advocate
Secure checkout • Privacy-first • Refund within 30 days if not a fit