Board opposes federal plan to reopen Southern California waters to offshore drilling
Loading...
Summary
The board unanimously except for one dissenting vote passed a resolution backing Rep. Mike Levin’s bill to prohibit new offshore leasing in Southern California planning areas; public comment largely supported the measure, citing environmental, economic and tourism risks from drilling or spills.
The Board of Supervisors voted to send a clear message opposing proposed federal offshore lease sales off Southern California. Supervisors introduced a resolution supporting federal legislation championed by Rep. Mike Levin (video testimony) that would prohibit new oil and gas leasing in the Southern California planning area. Supporters said the proposal protects beaches, coastal economies and public health and that a single spill could cause long‑lasting damage to tourism and the region’s ecosystems.
Public comment featured conservation groups, coastal organizations and scientists urging adoption, with speakers warning that even routine drilling carries spill risks and that local economies and habitats could be harmed. A number of callers urged the board to go further by pursuing local sanctuary designations and strengthened coastal protections.
Vice Chair Montgomery Stepp, Supervisor Desmond and others framed the action as part of a broader regional push — noting other coastal counties have passed similar resolutions — and described renewable investments as alternatives to expanding offshore drilling. The motion passed with a 4‑1 tally; Supervisor Anderson voted no.
What comes next: the board’s action is a formal local statement supporting Rep. Levin’s federal bill and is meant to be used in advocacy directed at the federal leasing process and in coordination with other local governments and stakeholders.
