A Braintree resident raised concerns about the district’s master-plan survey during public comment on Dec. 8, saying some questions appeared biased and warning that an opaque process would erode public trust.

John Cass, a parent and PTO representative, told the School Committee the promoted survey “raises serious issues,” citing four questions he called leading and expressing concern the effort could repeat prior consolidation votes. Cass urged a comprehensive accounting of every building’s condition, including completed and deferred maintenance, and recommended the district consider a plant and equipment tracking system to reduce repeated planning costs. He also questioned a consultant-driven master-plan cost he called “about $400,000.”

At the meeting, staff described the consultant scope: an educational adequacy assessment that rates how well spaces support learning, plus a complementary facilities condition index. Administration said consultants toured buildings in November and will present preliminary snapshots in January, and asked committee members and the community to complete an online weighting survey to inform priorities. The administration said the community survey would remain open through December and that the project’s next public outputs should appear this spring.

Committee members acknowledged the public concerns and asked staff to update website copy and survey deadlines after one member reported a posted deadline of Dec. 3 on the master-plan website. Staff agreed to update the site and encourage broader participation, noting materials and QR codes are being distributed through town channels.

Next steps: preliminary building-level educational adequacy and facility condition outputs are expected in January; the committee asked staff to correct dated website materials and to keep public feedback channels open.