Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Commission reviews public art fund, questions Mission Bell waiver and El Centro phasing

December 16, 2025 | South Pasadena City, Los Angeles County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commission reviews public art fund, questions Mission Bell waiver and El Centro phasing
Staff told the commission the public art fund balance was $12,597.50 and walked commissioners through a new project-status chart showing pending payments and in‑lieu fees.

Commissioner Burke praised the chart but raised several follow-up questions, asking specifically whether the Mission Bell project had invoked a waiver of the public art program fee. Planning Manager Jasmine Kim said that "there are specific state provisions that do allow for this waiver" and offered to provide a written follow-up with details about the state density bonus law and the specific project.

Commissioner Burke later questioned the $328,000 valuation reported for the Fairview Court remodel and the resulting $4,900 in-lieu fee, saying, "I'm not buying it." Senior Planner Steven Peterson explained that the 1020 El Centro project had been phased: "Phase 1 is the renovation of the school building... and phase 2... is the larger and more expensive component with the housing project," which can result in a lower reported valuation for the renovation phase.

Staff clarified payment timing: code requires the first half of required fees before permit issuance and the remainder prior to final certificate of occupancy; projects labeled "payment pending" may not yet have submitted for plan check. Staff also confirmed that public art in‑lieu payments are collected by the city and deposited into the public art fund.

What happens next: staff committed to providing a written follow-up on state waiver provisions and to update the project-status chart with clearer timeline markers for permit stage and payment expectations.

Ending: Commissioners asked staff to return with the requested legal and procedural detail at the next meeting so the commission can confirm fee compliance and expected revenue timing.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal