Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Nuisance Noise Parking topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Fairfax residents complain of persistent parking, engine revving and barking; council refers issue to infrastructure committee

Village of Fairfax Council · May 18, 2020
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Two residents told the Village of Fairfax council that activity at 3820 (referred to in one letter as 3820 Larson Road and in another as 3820 Watson) is causing repeated on‑street parking, constant dog barking and loud engine revving; council asked the infrastructure committee to review ordinances and meet with residents.

Two residents told the Village of Fairfax council that ongoing activity at a single household is disrupting nearby residents, and council agreed to ask the infrastructure committee to review enforcement options.

"They have 5 cars for 2 full time drivers," Robin Ryan wrote in a letter read aloud to the council, describing multiple vehicles parked on the street for days or weeks and frequent engine revving that, she wrote, "sounds like it's going to blow up." Ryan also said the property at 3820 (the letter names Larson Road) has yard conditions she called a "total junkyard." Another letter, from Deanna White, said she hears seven barking dogs and repeated engine noise that interrupted her son's remote schooling; White asked whether the village could enact a daytime noise ordinance (the mayor replied by email that such a change would take months).

Carson, who opened the meeting, said he understood the residents' concerns and asked the infrastructure committee (Russell, Christy and Jenny) to convene as soon as possible to review the situation and applicable codes. "We'll definitely sit down and look at all avenues...and we should let Mrs. Ryan and Mrs. White know about it, so that if they want to come to the meetings, they're more than welcome to come," Carson said.

A staff or legal speaker reminded council members that the village already has parking, general nuisance and noise provisions in its codes but acknowledged "limitations on how you can apply those," and said in some cases behaviors change after talks or citation. Lieutenant Nachioni of the police department told the council there were no new police items to report and thanked participants in a recent police memorial event.

Next steps: the council directed the infrastructure committee to review current ordinances and enforcement options and to set a meeting time (council members discussed trying to meet in June); the residents who submitted the letters will be notified and invited to the meeting. The council did not adopt any immediate ordinance change at this session.

Quote highlights from the transcript: "They have 5 cars for 2 full time drivers...They continue to park at least 3 cars on the street without moving them for days to weeks," — Robin Ryan (letter read aloud). "I asked for council's help with this situation...I've called police 3 times about the barking dogs," — Deanna White (letter read aloud). "We have parking ordinances...a general nuisance ordinance...and noise ordinances. To the extent there's a gap and we'd be able to fill that gap with something that's lawful, we can go ahead and do that," — Staff/legal speaker.

The council's referral is procedural: it directs committee review rather than changing law immediately. Residents may attend the committee meeting when it is posted.