Committee debates memorials and scholarship language; marks memorials policy reviewed
Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts
Subscribe
Summary
RSU 40/MSAD 40 policy committee discussed policy KF on memorials and memorial scholarships, including whether scholarships should be 'general' or donor‑designated and whether memorial plaques/trees should be allowed; after debate the committee marked the policy as reviewed (7-0).
The RSU 40/MSAD 40 policy committee dedicated a substantial portion of its meeting to policy KF, which governs memorials and memorial scholarships. Members debated two draft options and whether the board should pre‑establish criteria for accepting memorial scholarships.
Speaker 6 urged caution about permanent memorials on school grounds, saying schools are primarily places for learning and expressing concern that plaques or permanent plantings can persist regardless of future community sentiment: "Schools are places for learning, not grieving," Speaker 6 said. Other members noted long‑standing named scholarships and donations that families intend to remain in a person's name. The committee discussed whether a 'general scholarship fund' term might imply a pooled fund and whether donors should be allowed to designate a scholarship for a particular program or person.
After extended discussion about wording and community expectations, Speaker 7 moved to mark policy KF as reviewed. The committee approved the motion unanimously, 7-0, and staff was asked to continue refining language and to send updated drafts and questions to the administrator for follow-up with principals and stakeholders.