Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Code Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Plain City commission approves commercial architectural design standards, edits concrete block language
Summary
The Plain Planning & Zoning Commission approved ZC-25-15, adding Chapter 11.77 to require architectural design standards for commercial and multifamily development outside Uptown, with a single text edit replacing 'plain' with 'standard' concrete block; the measure passed by recorded assent.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Code Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Plain Planning & Zoning Commission on an October meeting approved ZC-25-15, a zoning-code amendment that adds Chapter 11.77 to establish architectural design standards for commercial and multifamily development outside the Uptown district. The commission accepted a staff-recommended wording change in section 11.77.04(3) to replace the word 'plain' with 'standard' when referring to concrete block.
Planning staff, identified in the meeting as Mister Hutchinson, said the standards apply to new construction and to existing commercial buildings when alterations exceed a 40% threshold, and that additions must be built to the current code. Hutchinson said the rules are intended to raise the appearance of older corridors and to provide consistent standards for standalone businesses that are not part of larger planned developments. "This is pretty standard, becoming more standard in other communities," Hutchinson said, describing the proposal as aligned with common practice elsewhere.
Hutchinson told commissioners the village has about 600 acres of planned commercial development and that staff will explore community grant tools to assist businesses that want to comply but may lack financial resources. The draft does not replace Uptown's separate design standards, he said.
Before the vote, commissioners requested and accepted the single text change to section 11.77.04(3). The commission then moved and approved the ordinance by recorded assent. Voting responses recorded during the meeting included: Mister Price — yes; Mayor Carney — yes; Miss McCoy — yes; Mister McCollum — yes; Mister Schwarc — yes. The amendment was approved with the specified change.
The commission did not note a delayed effective date in the meeting record; the code language presented indicates the standards apply to new construction and to existing facades when the stated thresholds are met. The commission next steps are to file the approved amendment in the code and communicate implementation details to staff and affected property owners.

