Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ordinance Peddlers topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council puts proposed peddlers and solicitors ordinance on hold for rewrite

Martinsville Common Council · November 25, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council members introduced a draft update to the peddlers/solicitations ordinance proposing registration, police-run background checks and license fees ($40/10 days; $150/120 days). Members asked for added penalties and directed staff to return with a revised draft at the next meeting.

Martinsville — Council members introduced a draft revision to the city’s peddlers, solicitors and transient merchants ordinance at the Nov. 10 meeting that would add registration requirements, police-handled background checks, ID tags and a tiered fee structure.

The draft, discussed by council members who worked on the item, proposes a $40 fee for a 10‑day license and $150 for a 120‑day license. A sponsor explained the preference for routing applications through the police department so officers can perform background checks and issue ID tags; the sponsor added applicants would be responsible for the background-check cost.

Council probed operational details. Chief Lang said the department can run local NCIC checks and estimated a local check at about $15, while more comprehensive checks can run $35–$45 depending on scope. Counsel and councilors noted the existing ordinance is processed by the clerk-treasurer and lacks meaningful penalties; members directed the drafters to add enforcement language so the ordinance will have “teeth.”

The council asked staff to prepare a first draft and indicated a public hearing will be required if the council wishes to adopt a fee-bearing ordinance. The council agreed to table the item for further revision and asked the clerk to email the current ordinance for comparison.

Outcome: council tabled the draft for further edits and asked staff to return with a revised ordinance and penalty language before scheduling a public hearing.