Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

LaSalle County approves requisitions, exits executive session; one member abstains on per diem

December 18, 2025 | LaSalle County, Illinois


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

LaSalle County approves requisitions, exits executive session; one member abstains on per diem
LaSalle County officials voted to come out of an executive session and approved a slate of requisitions that included multiple insurance premiums and consulting and per‑diem payments, with one member abstaining on a per‑diem item.

The body moved to exit executive session on a motion by Savage, seconded by Billard; the chair called roll and each named member present responded 'Aye' and the motion passed. Savage later moved, and Traeger seconded, to place 'Mike's' and 'Laura's' reports on file; that motion was approved without recorded opposition.

Clerks read a list of individual requisitions and payment items aloud before the roll call for approval. Items recorded in the meeting included: CCMSI $315 for claim administration runoff (November); CCMSI $7,112.50 for claim administration, loss control and safety coordination (January 2026); a per diem of $382.08 (Sept.–Nov.); an annual premium of $221,182.50; an annual insurance installment of $110,591.25; reference to ICRMT as part of coverage; Marsh and McLennan Agency $451,330.60 for the non‑ICRMT annual insurance premium; $3,000 for nursing‑home risk‑management consulting; and 36678 for Sandra Willard (09/01–11/30/25). Each line item was read individually into the record.

A motion to approve the full slate of requisitions was made by Small and seconded by Zanecki. During the roll call portion of that vote, Gary, Doug and Joe were recorded as voting 'Aye.' Member Sandy stated, "I abstain on Marius, I have I abstain on my per diem, aye on everything else," indicating an abstention on the per‑diem line and affirmative votes on other items; Craig said he also abstained. The motion passed by a substantial majority.

Members discussed the procedural downside of bundling multiple requisitions into a single vote when individual members may wish to vote differently on a single line. The body agreed to prepare a clearer, standalone motion for such items in future meetings and identified a member (Mike) to draft that motion for the record.

Doug moved to adjourn, Billard seconded, and the meeting adjourned after an 'Aye' vote.

The transcript does not include a published date for this meeting; details above reflect items read and votes recorded during the session.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Illinois articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI