Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Appointments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Forest Lake Area Schools board deadlocks after marathon debate over appointment; special meeting set
Summary
After nearly six hours of public comment and board debate, the Forest Lake Area Schools board failed to secure a majority for any finalist to fill a vacant seat, recording tied roll-call outcomes on multiple nomination motions. The board scheduled a special meeting Dec. 10 to continue the process.
The Forest Lake Area Schools Board of Education spent the evening of Dec. 4 entrenched in a dispute over who should fill a vacant board seat, ultimately failing to pass a nomination after multiple roll-call votes and setting a follow-up meeting for Dec. 10.
Board members spent much of the meeting debating the November resolution that named the highest unelected vote-getter from the 2024 election, Laura Durango, as a preferred finalist and instructed two committees to deliver additional finalists. Committees presented up to two candidates each; among the names put forward were Jim Smith and Scott Dobensinski.
Members repeatedly voted on competing nominations. A roll-call vote to appoint Jim Smith ended in a 3–3 tie (Christensen, Corcoran, Tyson voted yes; Castle, Antonson, Rebelein voted no) and failed to carry. A later roll call on a nomination for Scott Dobensinski likewise failed to secure the required majority.
Discussion at length ranged from competing views about whether the board should honor the electorate's prior preferences to questions about which background would best support the district's near-term priorities. Supporters of Jim Smith cited longstanding education experience and committee work; proponents of Scott Dobensinski emphasized military leadership and conflict-resolution skills.
The board considered procedural options including rescinding the Nov. 20 resolution, delaying the appointment and ordering new interviews. Those motions also failed to attract a majority. At the close of the meeting the board scheduled a special meeting at 6 p.m. on Dec. 10 to continue consideration and asked members to use the intervening days to meet informally with finalists.
Chair (identified only by role in the meeting) said the board had a legal obligation to fill the vacancy and urged members to find a path forward; others argued for taking more time for one-on-one discussions with finalists. Public commenters who had attended interviews the previous evening continued to press the board to prioritize transparency, honesty and experience.
The board did not complete other items tied to the special-order appointment during the late-night session. Members agreed to reconvene Dec. 10 to try to resolve the impasse.
What happens next: The board will return Dec. 10; any future nomination that wins a majority will be adopted by resolution. If no majority emerges, the board faces continued delay in filling the seventh seat and the operational complications that follow.
Quotes reflecting the debate include Member Christiansen's call to nominate one of the finalists: "My preferred finalist is Jim Smith," and Chair describing the legal backdrop: "Minnesota State Statute 123B.09 Subdivision 5 is very clear. Any vacancy on the Board must be filled by appointment."
