Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Public commenter urges Walnut Creek to adopt district elections, wants public input on demographer

December 17, 2025 | Walnut Creek City, Contra Costa County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Public commenter urges Walnut Creek to adopt district elections, wants public input on demographer
Walnut Creek Mayor Kevin Wilk opened a Dec. 16 special meeting to interview commission candidates, consider appointments and hold a closed session to consult with legal counsel on anticipated and existing litigation.

During the public comment period, Scott Rafferty identified himself and urged the council to "Adopt district elections," saying litigation threats over the issue have been expected for years. "Tom ****, I think it's been 6 years since he said he was gonna sue Walnut Creek," Rafferty said, adding his view that the dispute "is based on 30 year old data" and that the situation is "not a complete, disaster."

Rafferty pressed the council to consider alternatives to the current approach, saying "there's possibly, you know, ranked choice voting, and districts" and that cities across the country use districts. He argued the city should consider whether it would be "in the city's interest to be more representative," referenced a past dispute in Martinez and described what he called "an abuse of the law."

He also urged the council to involve the public in selecting the demographer who would analyze districting, saying "I think you should let the public speak on who the demographer's gonna be, and, there's a a couple that are not would be controversial." Rafferty offered to help with analysis and said he would "do whatever analysis you'd like."

Mayor Wilk confirmed the closed session would cover the items listed on the agenda and closed public communications after Rafferty's remarks. The council then moved to conduct commission interviews and consider appointments; no public action on district elections was taken during the recorded public comment period.

The meeting proceeded to interviews and a closed session on legal matters; no formal vote or appointment on district elections was recorded in the public comment portion of the meeting.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal