Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Eastern Center contribution rises; board debates Glenside classroom addition and Cedar Brook timing
Summary
Cheltenham's share of the Eastern Center for Arts & Technology operating budget is rising from $1.4M to $1.5M as sending enrollments grow; trustees discussed whether to approve Cedar Brook and a $6.8M Glenside addition next week or delay Glenside for more community input amid recent lower kindergarten cohorts and enrollment uncertainty.
Cheltenham School District staff previewed next week's budget and bid approvals related to regional career‑and‑technical programming and two building projects during the finance committee meeting on Dec. 2.
Staff said Cheltenham's contribution to the Eastern Center for Arts & Technology will increase from $1,400,000 last year to $1,500,000 this year—an $111,000 or roughly 8% increase—driven primarily by higher student participation (Eastern enrollment from 101 to 116 students). "This 8% increase means mostly we're sending more students to Eastern," staff said, and trustees praised Eastern's recent facility investments (culinary, welding, robotics) as strong for student outcomes.
At the same time, staff revisited two construction bids. The Cedar Brook addition (to create a 6–8 middle school configuration) and a proposed Glenside Elementary six‑classroom addition (capacity ~150 pupils) were up for board action next week. Staff cited a prior feasibility and enrollment study and said current Glenside enrollment is about 438, roughly 85% of the building's target capacity. The Glenside addition was estimated at $6.8 million with an expected annual debt‑service impact of about $500,000.
Trustees debated whether to bifurcate approvals so Cedar Brook could move forward while Glenside be delayed for additional public input and updated enrollment analysis. One trustee asked if the district could postpone Glenside until January or February to allow deeper public engagement; staff said bid prices generally must be held for about 60 days and that some schedule factors—like roofing work—drive timing.
Costs already incurred were discussed: staff said there are unpaid bills tied to the Glenside project "roughly about half $1,000,000," and noted some fees could remain if a decision were postponed. Several trustees recommended more public briefings and a separate, more visible presentation for community input if the project is not to be approved immediately.
What's next: Cedar Brook and the related material testing and track equipment bids will be on next week's board agenda; staff recommended separating Glenside so the community can be engaged further before the board votes.
