Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Open Space Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ken-Caryl board accepts South Hogback management plan, will continue vetting potential county arrangements

Ken-Caryl Metropolitan District Board of Directors · December 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board accepted the South Hogback Open Space Management Plan, a document intended to preserve the property; board members asked staff to continue title work, due diligence and community outreach about potential management or ownership arrangements with Jefferson County.

The Ken-Caryl Metropolitan District board voted Dec. 9 to accept the South Hogback Open Space Management Plan prepared by a task force, ERO and staff. Board members described the plan as a formal memorialization of the community’s expectation that the property be conserved and preserved.

In presenting the item, staff noted legal considerations including a reverter clause on the original deed and additional title and real-estate due diligence required before any management or ownership changes could proceed. Board members said they supported further vetting and public input and suggested that a reverter or similar protections could set parameters for future arrangements.

Public commenters — including former task force members and volunteers — urged the board to prioritize wildfire mitigation, weed control and clarity on mineral rights tied to the property. John Foshel, a member of the South Hogback Task Force and Firewise volunteer, raised concerns about cooperation with Jefferson County Open Space on wildfire mitigation and said that weed-control boundaries and mineral-rights issues remain of local concern.

The board passed the motion to accept the management plan by recorded vote (reported 4 to 0). Members asked staff to continue title research, consider quarterly reviews of the plan and ensure future discussions include clear public notice and community input.

Next steps: staff will continue vetting title and legal issues and will provide more detailed public materials and outreach; board members suggested periodic check-ins on plan implementation.