Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Regulations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
BPPE previews three 2025 regulatory packages; industry rep seeks publication timeline
Summary
The bureau summarized changes to three 2025 regulatory packages—unapproved activity, catalog requirements, and approval by means of accreditation—and an institutional representative requested clarity on publication timing to allow catalog updates.
Bureau staff reviewed three regulatory packages under development and solicited committee feedback at the Nov. 12 advisory meeting.
The bureau’s regulations tracker shows the minimum operating standards and refund policies package was submitted to the Office of Administrative Law on Oct. 6, 2025. Parker (bureau presenter) described three other 2025 packages still in progress: unapproved activity; catalog requirements; and approval by means of accreditation applications.
For unapproved activity, Parker said the bureau removed a previously proposed $10,000 minimum fine and added a listed aggravating/mitigating factor provision so the bureau can consider a fuller range of citation amounts. "We removed the $10,000 minimum fine amount," Parker said, describing the change as intended to give the bureau the full citation fine range available under statute.
On catalog requirements, Parker said changes include removing an automatic annual‑update requirement in favor of allowing annually updated catalogs so long as updates are clearly labeled and dated, plus added language about digital record storage and where records are kept when not at an institution’s primary administrative location. Staff also added language addressing programs designed to lead to licensure in California.
The approval‑by‑means‑of‑accreditation package similarly clarifies what information institutions must provide in applications (accreditation dates, locations, program details, record‑keeping information) and removes redundant language about ownership level.
During public comment, Damon Fugit of DeHart Technical School (Modesto) asked for a published timeline so institutions and accreditors can map BPPE changes to catalog updates and avoid inadvertent infractions. "We do utilize most of the language here directly into our policies and procedures, and that does directly impact how our catalog is written," Fugit said.
A committee member asked how the bureau defines "normal business hours" in catalog disclosures. Parker invited follow‑up and said feedback would be considered as the packages move toward notice‑and‑comment and publication. The bureau said it will publish notices and public‑comment periods to the subscribed regulatory mailing list and continue to engage stakeholders through the rule‑making process.
