Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Traffic topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors urge council to keep Courterra traffic off Indian Meadows, warn of safety impacts
Summary
Residents of Indian Meadows and nearby neighborhoods told the council that routing traffic from the Courterra development onto Nez Perce and Atlas would create unsafe conditions for pedestrians and schoolchildren and threaten mature street trees; they urged using Industrial Loop instead.
Residents urged the Coeur d'Alene City Council on Dec. 2 to prevent traffic from the Courterra development from being routed through Indian Meadows, saying existing roads already back up and that adding arterial volume would harm safety and neighborhood character.
At public comment, Carol Root said she documented repeated backups on Atlas at Kathleen (35 vehicles observed at one afternoon) and warned that five school‑bus routes serve children who walk to stops in the neighborhood. Pam Holcomb said Nez Perce was built as a rural street and read figures from a traffic analysis she described as estimating as many as 11,000 vehicles per day if the road is reclassified as a minor arterial. L'Oreal Rodick said petition signatures show widespread opposition to through‑traffic and that lot sizes proposed for the development differ from neighborhood expectations.
Councilmember Gookin said the city’s streets engineer is investigating congestion on Atlas and that regional Idaho Transportation Department projects have shifted traffic patterns; he invited residents to submit comments on the Apple Way/US‑95 exchange by the Friday public‑comment deadline. Gookin also told Duncan Koehler that the Marriott construction subsidence concern had been inspected and, he said, remediated by the developer according to an engineer’s stamp on inspection documents.
The council did not take formal action on routing for Courterra during the meeting. Multiple speakers asked staff and the council to consider Industrial Loop as an alternative route and to examine street‑tree protection and traffic‑calming measures before approving additional through‑traffic. The council acknowledged the concerns and said engineering staff would follow up.
