Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lewiston planning board considers tracking short-term rentals; staff says few listings, recommends light registration
Summary
Board members discussed whether Lewiston needs a short-term rental ordinance or a lighter registration system; staff reported relatively few listings and recommended collecting basic data through existing rental-registration tools before pursuing regulation.
Members of the Lewiston Planning Board debated whether to pursue a short-term rental ordinance or a lighter tracking approach at their Dec. 8 meeting.
Board member Zoe Lindstrom said she raised the topic to "keep an eye on" short-term rentals and suggested a registration similar to the city's rental-registration process so staff can quickly answer future questions about counts and rental activity. "I would be the most interested in bringing to the board and potentially... asking people to actually register those with the city for an easier way to keep track of them," she said.
Director John Connor told members the city currently has no formal mechanism beyond checking listing websites and that Lewiston is not a high-volume vacation market. "We don't have a mechanism to keep track of it other than using the websites that you mentioned," he said, adding staff often uses listings to spot properties that may lack required permits.
Board members noted the benefits and risks of regulation. Some expressed concern that unfettered short-term renting can reduce year-round housing stock in other communities, while others emphasized the business and civic benefits of flexible short-term lodging for events, traveling nurses and alumni visiting Bates College. Several members recommended low-burden ways to gather data — for example, adding a checkbox for short-term rentals to the existing rental-registration form or treating short-term rentals as a home-business type so they are visible in permit records.
The board did not direct staff to draft an ordinance that night; members asked staff to consider light-touch registration options and potential classification under existing business-licensing pathways so the city can collect information without imposing heavy new compliance burdens.
The discussion ended with the board broadly supportive of data collection first, then regulatory response only if local conditions change.
