Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Neighbors oppose Triand Advisors rezoning for Mount Holly Huntersville Road; petitioners cite revisions and traffic mitigation

December 16, 2025 | Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Neighbors oppose Triand Advisors rezoning for Mount Holly Huntersville Road; petitioners cite revisions and traffic mitigation
CHARLOTTE — Hundreds of residents and dozens of speakers turned out Dec. 15 to oppose a rezoning request on Mount Holly Huntersville Road that would allow townhomes and related uses on roughly 8.7 acres.

Bridget Grant, the petitioner’s land-use consultant, said the project was revised in response to community concerns: the daycare was removed and the applicant now proposes up to 95 townhomes with commitments for a 12-foot multi‑use path, a left‑turn lane into the site and a $50,000 contribution toward intersection improvements. Grant said the petitioner eliminated the highest trip‑generating use to reduce traffic and will submit final plans to staff prior to zoning committee review.

Neighborhood speakers pushed back. Aaron Oliverio and other residents told council the rezoning would be inconsistent with the 2040 policy map and premature while the Outer West community area plan is still in progress. Kelly Pledger summarized tabulated traffic numbers and asked the council to defer action: “95 townhomes which would generate approximately 624 daily trips which is 2.3 times the impact,” she said, citing the petition’s traffic estimate and arguing that the proposal would add congestion to an already congested arterial.

Council members pressed staff and CDOT for technical detail. Jay Carpenter of CDOT described existing pedestrian and bike connections near the site, noted the Tom Hunter light-rail station is about 900 feet south, and said multimodal options exist; staff and CDOT also discussed how traffic-study thresholds and permit triggers determine when frontage improvements are required.

Petitioners and staff said they continue to negotiate access and infrastructure language. The petitioner noted limits on creating private access through neighboring land and the availability of right-of-way already dedicated by the adjoining church. Council members asked for cumulative-impact mapping and clearer timing for traffic improvements before moving forward.

Next steps: staff indicated outstanding transportation and design issues and said additional conditions may be negotiated and incorporated into the development plan; the hearing record will inform zoning committee and council deliberations in January.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep North Carolina articles free in 2026

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI