Council denies appeal‑fee reimbursement after downtown notice dispute

Angels Camp City Council · December 17, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council considered a request to reimburse a $714 appeal fee for a Planning Commission decision and after debate — including business owners’ complaints about notification practices — the council voted to deny reimbursement (motion recorded as no fee reimbursement).

The Angels Camp City Council on Dec. 16 debated whether to reimburse an appellant’s appeal fee tied to a conditional use permit decision. Staff explained options: reimburse the full fee, reimburse a reduced amount, or deny the request. The staff memo noted prior council decisions had once approved and once denied similar reimbursements.

Public commenters representing downtown businesses said many merchants did not receive notice and recommended expanding notification to include tenants or a larger radius; one speaker said, "300 feet is not that far," urging that the city revise notice practices so downtown business owners receive timely planning notices. Staff said standard practice (in most jurisdictions) is to notify property owners using tax rolls, typically a 300‑foot radius, and that the item could be addressed on a future agenda.

After council discussion about consistency and the costs of appeals, Councilmember Alvin moved a motion for no fee reimbursement (no refund) for the appeal; that motion was seconded and after roll call was recorded as passing on the motion on the floor (motion passes on a recorded 3‑3‑2 measure). The council directed staff to consider notification changes for downtown business owners for future planning notices.