Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Commission Attendance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission adopts lower absence threshold and will consider recommending removal to city council
Summary
The planning commission voted to adopt amended attendance rules that allow the body to consider recommending a commissioner's removal after two unexcused absences or four total absences within the year; the amendment passed 4-0.
At a planning commission meeting, commissioners approved amended attendance rules that lower the threshold for a review of a commissioner's attendance record. The change, adopted as amended, allows the planning commission to consider recommending that the city council remove a commissioner if the individual accumulates two unexcused absences or four total absences during the year that runs July 1 to June 30.
Why it matters: The amendment shortens the window before a formal review can be initiated and preserves a role for the commission to evaluate circumstances before recommending removal to the city council. Commissioners said the change is intended to give the body flexibility to address blatant nonattendance while allowing room to treat legitimate absences as excused.
Details of the change: Speaker 2 read the revised language into the record: "A maximum of 4 absences, excused and unexcused, accumulated during any year beginning July 1 and ending June 30, or a maximum of 2 unexcused absences during any year beginning July 1 and ending June 30 shall cause the planning commission to consider potential recommendation that the city council remove said commissioner." Commissioners debated whether mandatory language should be softened to allow discretionary review; the body agreed to wording that provides the commission discretion to recommend removal.
Discussion and rationale: Commissioners recounted past instances of problem attendance and described practical safeguards: informal outreach by fellow commissioners or contact by the city manager, and a review by the commission that can consider private or sensitive circumstances before a referral to council. One commissioner noted municipal code gives the appointing body the authority to remove commissioners.
Vote and next steps: The motion to adopt the rule changes together with the amendment regarding four total absences for review was moved and seconded and passed as amended by a vote of 4 in favor and 0 against. The commission said staff will post a cleaned version of the updated rules.
Provenance: The discussion and motion begin with the exchange at the start of the transcript and conclude when the vote is recorded (topic introduced at SEG 001; discussion and motion concluded at SEG 224).
