Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the West End Rezone topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Boise council approves MX‑1 rezone and 21‑unit townhome subdivision at 1907 W. Jefferson amid neighborhood protests
Summary
City council approved rezoning 1.96 acres at 1907 W. Jefferson to MX‑1 and a preliminary plat for 21 townhomes with one small commercial space despite neighborhood testimony calling the change 'spot zoning.' Council cited code compliance and nearby transit access.
Get email alerts on the West End Rezone topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Boise City Council voted to rezone roughly 1.96 acres at 1907 West Jefferson from R‑2/R‑3 to MX‑1 and approved a preliminary plat creating 21 residential lots, one neighborhood‑scaled commercial lot and two common lots.
Planning staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval, saying the property sits between arterial streets and transit routes and that the MX‑1 designation aligns with the city's future land‑use map. Jesse, a planning staff member, told the council the project would meet development‑code standards and that a 10‑foot pedestrian path and other mitigation measures were required.
Developer Ben Semple of Rodney Evans & Partners described a design of primarily two‑ and three‑story townhomes with rooftop amenity space, elevators in individual units and at least one corner commercial shell estimated at 900–1,000 square feet. Semple said the project would exceed parking requirements and incorporate utility upgrades including an 8‑inch water main connection and a new hydrant. “This is not an affordable housing project,” Semple said, adding that the developer agreed to planning conditions that limit parapet height to 35 feet with 45‑foot overruns.
Neighbors testified at length in opposition. A West End Neighborhood Association representative said residents feared “spot zoning,” objected to the scale relative to largely one‑ and two‑story adjacent homes, and raised concerns about traffic and parking on narrow Jefferson Street. Margie Twitchell, who lives nearby, told the council the triangular lot and a proposed commercial corner would worsen vehicle congestion, saying there are already many coffee shops in walking distance. Several residents urged the council to uphold recently adopted zoning rules and avoid exceptions.
Council members pressed staff and the applicant on comparative development that could be built under current R‑2/R‑3 zoning, setback differences under MX‑1, mitigation for traffic impacts and design review. Jesse explained that R‑2 and R‑3 allow multifamily uses and taller maximum heights but that minimum lot sizes and setbacks differ; the MX‑1 zone permits a 0‑foot minimum setback to encourage a pedestrian streetscape, while the approved condition in this case limits the parapet to 35 feet.
In deliberations council members described conflicting neighborhood desires — some wanted denser multifamily housing, others wanted lower scale — but several members concluded the proposal met code and the comprehensive plan's goals for infill near transit. A motion to approve the rezone (CR 25‑17) carried on roll call; the subsequent motion to approve the subdivision (SUV 25‑50) also passed.
Councilors referenced the conditions established by planning staff, including the 35‑foot parapet limit and requirements for sidewalks, public pathway easement, and utility improvements. The developer said amenities and infrastructure would be installed in phase one and that the commercial space would be a low‑intensity tenant or potentially owner‑occupied office space if no operator was found.
Next steps: approval of the preliminary plat allows the developer to move forward with detailed design and permitting subject to the conditions of approval; future design review and permitting actions will address architectural details and final construction plans.

