Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Board Governance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board rejects repeal of Rule 1-70, approves amendment to allow co-facilitation of work sessions

Green Bay Area Public School District Board of Education · November 25, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board voted down a motion to repeal Rule 1-70 (assigning board members to facilitate work sessions) but approved an amendment to modify the rule to permit co-facilitators and to clarify delegation to the board president if needed.

The Green Bay Area Public School District board on Monday voted against repealing Board Rule 1-70 but approved a compromise amendment to change how work-session facilitation is assigned.

Lynn (speaker 7) moved to repeal the rule, arguing the practice of appointing board members to preside over work session meetings was outdated and inconvenient. The repeal motion failed on a roll-call vote: Becker—no; McCoy—yes; Lyerly—no; McGirlock—yes; Minnow—no; Connell—yes; Meister—no.

Board member Andrew (speaker 14) then offered an amendment to modify the rule instead of repealing it. He said his changes would "change 'preside over' to 'facilitate,' add co-facilitators and remove the required pairing with the superintendent," and that the amendment addressed members’ concerns about scheduling and implied authority. The amendment was seconded and carried with all board members voting in favor.

Why it matters: The action preserves an option for shared facilitation and creates clearer delegation procedures while keeping the broader rule framework in place. Supporters of repeal said removing the rule would remove an unnecessary administrative constraint; supporters of amendment said a modest revision would address concerns without eliminating shared leadership opportunities.

What’s next: Board discussion of Policy 1-70 (the policy-level language) was tabled so staff can compare the newly amended rule text with existing policy language and return with any needed policy revisions.

"To vote to repeal this is something that does not help any individual — it takes away from those board members who would like to have this opportunity for facilitation," Andrew said in urging a no vote on repeal but a yes on his amendment.