Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows
House Oversight Committee advances bill to add citizenship question to census, drawing sharp Democratic opposition
Loading...
Summary
The House Oversight Committee voted to report HR 151, the Equal Representation Act, after adopting a substitute that would add a simple citizenship question to the decennial census and apportion representatives based on citizens only. Republicans said the change improves apportionment accuracy; Democrats said it is unconstitutional and would depress census participation, risking federal funding for communities.
The House Oversight and Reform Committee on markup day adopted an amendment in the nature of a substitute to HR 151, the Equal Representation Act, and voted to report the bill to the full House. The substitute would add a yes/no citizenship question to the decennial census and require apportionment to be based on U.S. citizens rather than the whole population.
Chairman Comer framed the bill as a measure to ensure ‘‘federal representation is determined by Americans only’’ and said the substitute simplifies the question to a straightforward “Are you a citizen of the United States? Yes or no.” He argued collecting that information will let the federal government produce a more accurate apportionment base and cited American Community Survey estimates the committee heard describing about 21 million noncitizens nationally (nearly 7% of the population). The chair said the proposal will prevent states with low citizen shares from gaining representation at the expense of states with higher shares of citizens.
Ranking Member Garcia and other Democrats strongly opposed the bill, calling it unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment’s requirement to count the “whole number of persons” for apportionment. Democrats warned that adding a citizenship question would deter responses—especially among mixed‑status households—and lead to undercounts that reduce federal funding and political representation for communities of color and immigrant families. Representative Frost said an undercount could harm schools, hospitals and disaster response, and cited estimates that census data guide roughly $2.8 trillion in annual funding allocations.
Members debated constitutional and legal precedents, with lawmakers referencing the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Department of Commerce v. New York and issues under the Administrative Procedure Act. Supporters said the court confirmed that a citizenship question may be permissible; opponents said prior attempts were struck down and that practical harms to participation remain substantial.
After debate the committee agreed the substitute amendment and ordered the bill favorably reported; a recorded vote later showed the committee split 20‑19 in favor.
The committee paused its proceedings for a vote series and then reconvened to record results. The bill now goes to the House floor under the committee’s report. The committee also ordered reconsideration laid on the table and authorized staff technical conforming changes.
