Council authorizes design contract for downtown gateway arches despite split vote
Loading...
Summary
Council authorized a $525,000 LTAC‑funded contract with MIG Inc. for final design and engineering of Downtown Gateway Arches and comprehensive wayfinding signage after a 5–3 roll‑call vote; opponents argued LTAC tourism funds would be better spent on projects with clearer tourism‑generated returns or on pressing infrastructure needs.
The council voted on Dec. 9 to authorize a contract with MIG Inc. for final design and engineering of the Downtown Gateway Arches and associated wayfinding signage, funding the work from the city’s LTAC (lodging tax) allocation. Staff said the $525,000 covers final design/engineering for the signage package, not construction; conceptual construction cost estimates for each gateway arch are roughly $800,000 to $1.2 million.
Council debate was robust. Councilmember Whiting argued LTAC funds should be conserved for projects with a clearer head‑in‑bed tourism return — citing alternatives such as advancing an Aspen Institute partnership or other visitor‑drawing amenities — and suggested the arches might not drive measurable tourism. "I don't think these gateway arches are going to bring a single person to pile up," he said. Other members countered that the arches are part of a master wayfinding and downtown revitalization plan approved in March and that LTAC is an appropriate source because the elements are intended to attract and orient visitors.
Staff clarified the procurement steps: final engineering will produce construction‑ready documents and will be followed by a city‑initiated LTAC request for construction funds in a subsequent year if council chooses to fund fabrication and installation. The LTAC committee previously reviewed and recommended the larger wayfinding package in 2024.
On roll call the motion passed 5–3 (Deputy Mayor King, Council members Gilliam, Johnson and Mayor recorded as aye; Council members Whiting, Doerr and Adler recorded as nay). The council noted that wayfinding signage design and the parking‑related signage scope were also authorized separately and that staff would continue to seek funding avenues for construction.
Next steps: final designs will be completed, more precise cost estimates produced and staff will bring forward construction funding requests in future LTAC cycles or other sources for council consideration.
