Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Airport Farm Leases topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Gratiot County commissioners table airport farmland lease after dispute over acreage and bidding

Gratiot County Board of Commissioners · December 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners paused a proposed multi-year lease at the Gratiot County airport after conflicting USDA parcel information and concerns about whether available farmland has been offered competitively; board members asked staff to clarify acreage and maps before returning the item.

The Gratiot County Board of Commissioners deferred a decision about leasing airport farmland after an extended debate about how much tillable acreage the county actually controls and whether those acres should be put out for competitive bid.

Board discussion centered on a discrepancy between acreage reported to the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the parcels the airport manager says are currently being farmed. One commissioner cited USDA reporting that ties 349.64 tillable acres to the airport’s farm number and said the county was leasing far less land in practice. "I don't believe until we know exactly what we have that we should be approving anything," the commissioner said, urging more complete mapping and a competitive-bid process.

Airport staff and advisory members responded that only two parcels are currently being farmed and that some land is not tillable because of runway proximity. The airport manager said he had obtained USDA acreage listings and maps and had negotiated lease terms with the current farmers that included a CPI adjustment and a proposed five-year term; staff said the historic practice had included one-year leases and that work remained to reconcile the records.

Because competing information could not be resolved during the meeting, commissioners moved to table the item until staff can reconcile parcel maps and farm numbers with USDA records and present clarified acreage and bidding options. The motion was carried by voice vote.

The board did not authorize new leases or changes to existing lease terms at this meeting; commissioners asked staff to return with maps, parcel-level documentation and recommended procurement options before any lease is approved.