Planning board sends turtle‑lighting ordinance back to staff after concerns about special‑event limits
Loading...
Summary
Boardors unanimously directed staff to rework ordinance 2025-16, the proposed wildlife/turtle lighting ordinance, after hoteliers and board members said its transient‑lighting and visibility definitions could effectively bar nighttime special events; staff will return with clearer permit examples and consult technical experts.
The St. Pete Beach Planning Board voted unanimously on Dec. 15 to send ordinance 2025-16 — proposed amendments to beach lighting intended to protect nesting sea turtles and shorebirds — back to staff for rework after members and hotel representatives raised concerns that its definitions and transient‑lighting ban could effectively prevent legitimate, compliant special events.
The draft adopts language from the state model lighting ordinance and tightens some standards: it reduces maximum visible light transmittance for glass visible from the beach to 30% (the draft cites Sea Turtle Conservancy‑reviewed research), requires long‑wavelength bulbs for new pools where safety permits, clarifies full cutoff/shielded fixtures, and proposes that any transient special‑event lighting visible from the beach be prohibited at night during sea‑turtle nesting season.
Why it matters: The proposal aims to reduce false crawls and misdirected hatchling movement by minimizing artificial lighting visible from nesting beaches. Hotel operators and event organizers said the draft, as written, would prevent many nighttime weddings, receptions and other events and asked for clearer guidance on how to stage permitted events without violating turtle‑lighting rules.
Hotel representative Kristen Simmons (Loews/Loose Hotel) told the board the lighting definitions and the draft’s expansive definition of "transient lighting" could "essentially eliminate all nighttime events due to the lighting," undermining businesses’ ability to reopen evening operations. "This would heavily impact us with the lighting ordinance," she said.
Staffer Brandon said the draft follows the state model lighting ordinance and incorporates technical recommendations from the Sea Turtle Conservancy and FDEP where available. He told the board that some items are codifications of existing enforcement practice (for example, exterior lighting compliance and 2007 grandfathering of pre‑existing fixtures) and that the city’s code enforcement division would handle enforcement. He also said some proposed construction triggers and repair/maintenance thresholds were intended to align with existing practice and to survive scrutiny under Senate Bill 180.
Board members asked for concrete examples and permit paths so hotels and event planners can know in advance how to comply. Several members recommended the city create guidance materials or pre‑inspection checklists and to engage with technical experts and affected local businesses before returning the draft.
Outcome and next steps: The motion directing staff to rework the ordinance and clarify special‑event permit paths, shielding/visibility standards, and season dates passed unanimously. Brandon said he would meet with the Sea Turtle Conservancy this week and return with options and clearer examples for how compliant special events might be permitted without endangering nests. The ordinance remains under local planning agency review prior to City Commission consideration.
