Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Communications Platform topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Vendor pitches Onflow communications platform; board asks for baselines and change-management plan
Summary
K12 Insight representative Ellie Brown demonstrated Onflow, a unified inbound communications and service-desk platform, saying it centralizes channels, offers a chatbot, ticketing and dashboards. Board members pressed for baseline data, implementation timelines and assurances about data handling.
Ellie Brown, a representative of K12 Insight, told the Dayton City School Board on Dec. 9 that Onflow is designed to consolidate the district’s inbound communications into a single service desk so departments no longer work in silos. “We’re a unified service desk,” she said, adding the platform routes inquiries to the right staff and provides dashboards to measure response time and stakeholder satisfaction.
Board members asked how the district would measure outcomes such as enrollment, attendance or customer-service responsiveness. Brown said measurable key performance indicators vary by district and recommended the cabinet set target KPIs; she cited an ROI calculator the firm uses and said districts typically see measurable usage results three to six months after launch.
Brown described the platform’s features: a chatbot pop-up for common questions, a topic-focused “connect with us” interface, recorded call logs and voice-mail transcription into tickets linked to the district’s student information system, and a post-interaction satisfaction score the vendor calls an “x score.” “We don’t share to any third parties,” Brown told the board when asked about AI and data storage; she said the chatbot draws only from the district’s resource center and districts control retention for FOIA and public‑records purposes.
On technical support and costs, Brown said the firm maintains a 24/7 client-care team for critical alerts and recommended training several district administrators to serve as system admins. She stated the proposal as presented contains no add-on fees.
Board members raised practical concerns: whether the tool simply routes users or provides live agents during high-volume events (Brown said the service-desk side routes to multiple local agents using the district’s existing number), how translation works (the chatbot uses Bing Translate with district‑selected languages), and whether the roughly one-year contract in the purchase request is adequate. The vendor and staff said Onflow could consolidate systems the district currently uses (emails, FMX, Incident IQ) and that a formal change-management plan would be produced if the board moves forward.
Next steps: administration asked board members to submit remaining questions by email because a vote on the purchase is expected next week. The superintendent and staff agreed to provide baseline data and a change-management plan for board review before final approval.
