Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solid Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisors discuss purchase of roughly 450 acres adjacent to county landfill; no sale finalized
Summary
County staff presented a potential purchase of about 450 acres adjacent to the Louisa County landfill at $9,000 per acre with a $500,000 phased deposit and a due‑diligence period to April 15; supervisors debated road construction costs, permitting implications and community concerns but did not finalize the acquisition.
Get email alerts on the Solid Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County staff presented a proposed purchase agreement for approximately 450 acres adjacent to the Louisa County landfill and summarized the main contract terms during the Dec. 1 meeting.
Key terms described by staff included a purchase price of $9,000 per acre, an initial deposit of $500,000 to be paid in equal monthly shares and a due‑diligence period that runs through April 15 and is terminable by the county. The draft also contemplates construction of a seller‑provided road to address existing access and adverse‑possession concerns on the parcel adjoining the active landfill.
Supervisors asked for additional cost detail on constructing and building the road and raised questions about whether the price reflected comparable transactions. Staff and consultants said expanding adjacent acreage can improve the probability of permitting success for new cells compared with siting an entirely new landfill, and supervisors cited consultant estimates that permitting new landfill cells can be a multi‑decade process in some scenarios.
Some supervisors expressed concern about the timing and whether the county is years away from needing additional landfill capacity; others emphasized forward planning and the cost of assembling similar acreage at a later date. Multiple supervisors proposed contract edits (including striking confidentiality language and clarifying road construction timelines and standards) and asked staff for further cost and legal analysis before any final vote.
No final sale or appropriation was approved during the meeting; board members directed staff to return with additional details.

