Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Facilities Bond topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Lakeville board authorizes submission to MDE for $139.6M middle-school expansion after split vote

Lakeville Public School District Board of Education · December 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After extended debate over timing, community support and package design, the Lakeville board voted to authorize administration to submit to the Minnesota Department of Education a revised facility-improvement package (option 2, roughly $139.6 million) to expand Kenwood Trail, Century and McGuire middle schools; the motion included furniture and tennis-court items added by amendment.

The Lakeville Public School District board voted Nov. 11 to authorize administration to prepare and submit the required review and comment to the Minnesota Department of Education for a facilities bond package focused on middle-school expansions.

The motion (pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 123B.71) asked the administration to submit the option-2 plan for Kenwood Trail, Century and McGuire middle schools. The package described in the board packet and through debate included classroom additions, cafeteria and kitchen expansion, gym/circulation adjustments and associated infrastructure; the amended package added districtwide furniture and Kenwood tennis-court work. The total figure discussed during the meeting was described as approximately $139.6 million.

Board members split sharply during the discussion. Supporters said the district faces imminent capacity constraints in its three middle schools and that authorizing MDE review gives voters a clear choice and buys the district time to build capacity without having to construct an entirely new middle school. "If we don't give the community the choice, I don't like withholding that choice," a director said. Opponents urged delay, arguing the survey shows insufficient public understanding and that the board needs a stronger communications strategy and a clearer teaching-and-learning plan before placing a large bond question before voters.

After amendments and further discussion, a roll-call vote recorded the following affirmative votes: Ray Thompson (Yes), Amber Cameron (Yes), Ned Swanson (Yes), Ben Baker (Yes), Paul Harbone (Yes) and Carson Anderson (Yes). The board's action authorizes staff to proceed with the administrative step of preparing the MDE review and comment; it does not by itself place a question on a ballot.

What happens next: Administration will prepare detailed designs, cost estimates, and the formal review-and-comment packet for MDE. If the board later decides to place a question before voters, the district must also finalize ballot language, campaign communications and scheduling decisions.

Note on procedure: The board explicitly cited Minnesota Statutes section 123B.71 when making the motion to authorize MDE review and comment.