Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Utilities Aqua Acwa topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge Caroline County to challenge Aqua Virginia after repeated brown water, outages and proposed large rate increase
Summary
Dozens of Lake Landor residents told the Caroline County Board of Supervisors they endured repeated outages, brown and chemically strong water, and unpredictable bills under Aqua/Aqua Virginia; speakers urged the board to oppose a roughly 29% rate hike and to explore legal remedies. The board said it will consider the matter with counsel and discuss litigation strategy in closed session.
The Caroline County Board of Supervisors heard more than a dozen public commenters Tuesday night pressing the county to hold Aqua (Aqua Virginia/ACWA) accountable for repeated service failures and to oppose the company’s proposed rate increase.
Homeowner Tyler Wilson of the Lake Landor community told the board that a water main break over Thanksgiving left his neighborhood without reliable water for several days and prompted a boil-water advisory. “This rate hike cannot and should not be allowed to happen,” he said, adding that he had bought bottled water and suffered disruptions to a family holiday.
Why it matters: Residents described years of brown water, frequent flushing, short lifespans for in‑home filters and widely varying bills that in some cases reached hundreds of dollars a month. Several speakers said third‑party testing showed unusually high chlorine levels in flushed samples and called for the county to use every available legal avenue to stop a large rate increase that would raise monthly charges for households already paying high amounts for water.
Several residents cited specific complaints: Sharon Dunn said she pays about $286 per month now and would face another $46 if the increase proceeds; Melanie Lamberti described a third‑party test she had commissioned that showed chlorine above 5 milligrams per liter and said ACWA personnel declined a request to allow independent retesting; Pam Taylor summarized the community impact and called the November outages a “severe community health crisis.”
County response and next steps: Board members thanked residents and said the comments would be placed on the public record. Supervisor Black told the audience the board will discuss the matter further in closed session and review legal options; later the board moved to convene a closed session specifically to consult legal counsel about pending and anticipated regulatory actions and litigation before the State Corporation Commission involving public utilities. The motion cited statutory authority for legal consultation and was approved.
What residents asked for: speakers urged (1) denial or opposition to the rate application at the State Corporation Commission, (2) independent or third‑party water testing and transparent publication of results, (3) stronger customer billing review and credits for outages, and (4) county consideration of options to acquire or manage local water infrastructure if feasible.
The board did not immediately vote on an action regarding Aqua’s rate application. Instead, members said staff and county counsel will review the record and discuss strategy in closed session; the chair said the board will update the public as permitted by law after that consultation.
