Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Drainage Flooding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents detail repeated home flooding in District 1; county cites funding limits for large drainage projects
Summary
Multiple District 1 residents told the Brevard County commission that repeated storms left homes and yards flooded, some displaced; county staff said two drainage projects (Dixie Village and Westwood) are planned but lack current funding and that rear‑lot drainage is generally homeowner responsibility under county code.
Dozens of residents described recent and repeated flooding in District 1 to the Brevard County Board of County Commissioners on Dec. 2, saying standing water, failing culverts and clogged ravines inundated yards and, in some cases, homes.
"I have 18 inches of water in my house for over 12 hours," Del Berry told the commission, describing lengthy displacement and property loss after the October storm that left parts of Westwood and Kirby underwater. Teresa Williams, who said she lives at 3050 Kirby Drive, said drywall and flooring were removed from her house and that she is currently unable to live there.
The public outcry prompted questioning of county roads-and-bridges staff. Mark, the county road and bridge official who spoke to the board, said rear-lot and side-lot drainage are the responsibility of homeowners under Brevard County code and that the department focuses on public road infrastructure. He also said the county has undertaken maintenance work in easements and is designing two larger projects—one for Dixie Village (roughly $4,000,000) and a Westwood drainage project (roughly $2,000,000)—but lacks funding to build both and will seek state appropriations next year.
"We have been on-site, we've answered emails, we've answered phone calls," Mark said, noting staff will continue to work with the board on funding strategies. Commissioners asked staff to provide more detail, including whether an artesian well or overflow structure exists behind the impacted properties and whether capping or plugging a free-flowing well could reduce flooding.
Residents pressed for quicker maintenance and clearer communication about how and when county crews clear ravines and ditches. Nancy Albritton told the board the county’s roads-and-bridges crew is small and that recent maintenance work had sometimes left debris in ravines, worsening yard flooding.
Commissioners acknowledged the scale of the problem and said it will take time and resources to address long-standing drainage and stormwater infrastructure shortfalls. Several commissioners said they will include drainage work in upcoming budget and master-drainage-planning conversations and requested staff brief the board on applicable statutes and the county’s authority to act where private drainage and easements are involved.
Next steps: county staff will research artesian-well capping options (including St. Johns River Water Management District programs), clarify which drainage responsibilities fall to homeowners versus county maintenance, and present further information during a future budget workshop and follow-up briefing.
