Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Site Plan And Bond topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustees hear site-plan update for proposed library/senior center; bond and fundraising still undecided
Summary
Trustees received a site-planning update and learned the City Council accepted the site plan and dissolved the ad hoc committee; the board discussed potential bond funding, design costs and private fundraising but no commitment to a bond measure was made.
The South Pasadena Library Board of Trustees received updates on the library/community center site-planning process at its Nov. 18 special meeting, and trustees discussed funding options — including a possible capital-improvements bond and private fundraising — but no action to fund design or construction was taken.
Trustees said the city council accepted the committee''s site plan and dissolved the ad hoc committee, with the committee''s current members given priority to serve on future work groups. Board members described the committee''s preferred option as a multiuse approach to retain and repurpose parts of the existing building while constructing new, shared spaces for the library and senior center.
Discussion turned to funding. Trustees referenced local reporting and committee estimates that put a high-end cost scenario near $60 million, but they cautioned that figure represented a maximum option and was not the committee''s endorsed baseline. Trustees said the city is considering whether to place a capital-improvements bond on a future ballot; the board emphasized that polling and feasibility work by the city is a prerequisite before committing to design-phase spending.
Trustees flagged one-time design costs and the sequencing risk: the board discussed a roughly $1 million price tag for design and predevelopment work, and stressed that the city should avoid spending substantial design dollars unless polling indicates a strong chance of voter approval. Members also discussed the role private fundraising could play, including engaging local donors and library supporters to help close funding gaps.
The board discussed learning from comparable campaigns in other cities and invited committee members and outside speakers to brief trustees on fundraising sequence and lessons learned. Trustees noted the city would need to decide whether to include the library project in a bond measure and, if so, what portion of the bond would be dedicated to the project.
Next steps: trustees will continue to monitor city polling and feasibility work, coordinate messaging via a draft press release prepared by a committee member, and consider inviting outside fundraising and campaign practitioners to a future meeting.
