After heated debate, board approves ethnic-studies elective for juniors and seniors

Winona Area Public School District ยท December 19, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Winona Area Public Schools' board approved an ethnic-studies elective for high-school juniors and seniors after extended debate and a temporary motion to table; supporters said the course aligns with state statute and student interest, while opponents said the course language on equity and identity was divisive.

The Winona Area Public School District board approved an ethnic-studies elective for juniors and seniors after an extended exchange between board members, a student speaker and members of the public.

The course proposal drew a public comment opposing the curriculum as "DEI" and "racist," and several board members asked for more detail on textbooks, mandated state content, and who would teach the class. A student speaker supported the course, saying it would let students study histories and cultures in depth and praised the proposed instructor. Administrators said the course is elective, will be listed in course offerings and will run only if student demand warrants it.

Board members discussed whether the course's language about equity, social justice and identity represented a balanced approach or risked politicizing instruction. One director moved to table the item to allow further review; the board debated whether tabling should preclude discussion. Following the discussion the board took a roll-call vote to approve the course. Administration cited Minnesota statutory guidance on ethnic studies and noted the district would align policy language with state statute and model policy from MSBA.

The board emphasized the approved course is optional for students, that running the class depends on enrollment and that curriculum materials and teacher assignment would be provided to the board in follow-up. The transcript records both strong opposition and strong support from board members and a student; the vote ultimately carried on a roll call.