Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Controversy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Student speaker accuses board members of attack mailers, demands public apologies
Summary
A Council Rock High School junior accused board officials of participating in misleading, attack-style campaign mailers during public comment and called for public apologies; the board made no response in the meeting record.
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Controversy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During the meeting’s second public-comment period on Dec. 11, Joshua Morris, a junior at Council Rock High School South, criticized recent school-board campaigning and accused some candidates and board members of distributing “nasty, misleading, out of touch lies and attack mailers.”
Morris named several local board figures and candidates in his remarks, saying the materials had attacked opponents on issues including age, disability and ideology. “I’m here to beg the board to stop the political dysfunction,” Morris said. He then asked for “a sincere public apology from Nikki, Jim, and Cheryl for these horrible attacks,” adding that the attacks had come from a group he identified as active in local races.
The transcript records no reply or apology from board members during the meeting. The complaint was raised during public comment and therefore is not a formal board finding; the board took no formal action on the allegation at the Dec. 11 meeting.
Context: earlier in the meeting the board had confirmed recent election results and welcomed reelected and newly elected members. Public comment on this evening’s agenda also included a separate speaker, Carolyn Bueser Blacknell, who raised concerns about local housing affordability and municipal cost increases using data she attributed to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
Next steps: The allegation was aired publicly in comment; the transcript does not record a board response or investigation. Any formal inquiry, statement or disciplinary action would have to be surfaced in subsequent board meetings or through the district’s public records and ethics processes.

