Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Community Advocacy And Evaluation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission outlines community advocacy portfolio, FSP evaluation and Proposition 1 implementation work
Summary
Staff reviewed the commission’s current community advocacy contracts across nine priority populations, the full service partnership evaluation requirements under SB 465 (funded at $400,000 annually), and the commission’s role in implementing Proposition 1, including a $100,000 per year implementation allocation. Commissioners pressed for measurable outcomes and integrated fiscal-program oversight.
Ryan Kopchak, assistant deputy director for legislative and external affairs, and Lauren Quintero reviewed the commission’s community advocacy work and the legislative and fiscal context for full service partnerships (FSPs) and Proposition 1 implementation.
Kopchak described the nine priority advocacy populations the commission funds (transition-age youth, veterans, LGBTQIA+, immigrant and refugee communities, K–12 students, families/caregivers, consumers, diverse racial/ethnic communities, and older adults) and summarized local and statewide contractors serving those populations. He noted multiple advocacy contracts are three-year agreements and that six advocacy contracts will expire in 2027, prompting several RFPs to be issued in 2026.
On FSPs, staff reviewed SB 465 requirements and described the commission’s ongoing evaluation work. Lauren Quintero explained a January 2022 budget change proposal resulted in $400,000 in ongoing funding to support evaluation, reporting and community engagement related to FSPs, and that recent contract work with UCSF and other partners supports analyses of child-serving and adult FSP outcomes.
On Proposition 1 and the Behavioral Health Services Act, staff said the commission received an annual $100,000 Proposition 1 implementation allocation for three years to support communications, legal/legislative support and staff training tied to BHSA implementation. Speakers emphasized the commission’s expanded membership and responsibilities under BHSA.
Commissioners pressed staff about outcomes, evaluation metrics, and whether commission funding should be catalytic rather than ongoing supplemental spending. Commissioner Steve Carnivale urged development of a finance/evaluation framework to align budget decisions with strategic outcomes and ROI; Commissioner Gordon emphasized prevention and workforce-development outcomes for youth. Staff said they publish contractor annual and final reports online and will provide commissioners with performance metrics and samples.
Next steps: staff will prepare outcome metrics and reporting that align program and fiscal oversight, advance planned RFPs in 2026, and bring FSP evaluation deliverables to future meetings.
