Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use And Environment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tribes and commissioners press for basin‑level well data and active language in Mason County comprehensive plan
Summary
Tribal representatives urged Mason County to include basin‑by‑basin well estimates, active commitments to develop offset projects for exempt wells, and specific planning language in the county comprehensive plan; commissioners endorsed continued collaboration and suggested placing detailed tables in an appendix.
During a government‑to‑government session Nov. 25, tribal leaders met with county planning staff and commissioners to discuss remaining elements of the county’s 2025–2045 comprehensive plan related to groundwater and streamflow restoration.
Tribal representatives asked the county to: (1) insert basin‑by‑basin estimates of existing wells (rather than a single county‑wide total), (2) adopt active language committing the county to "develop and finalize offset projects to offset consumptive use of per and exempt wells," and (3) ensure the comp plan references the watershed restoration work and the memorandum of agreement (MOA) supporting streamflow restoration under RCW 90.94.
County staff and commissioners described the available data (an inventory and consultant estimates by basin, including a table prepared by Mott MacDonald) as "the best available data" and discussed placing basin tables in an appendix to preserve planning context without creating unintended permitting constraints. Commissioners and tribal leaders also discussed the need for funding (grants) for offset projects and a shared monitoring program (co‑funding of a Goldsboro streamflow gauge was referenced).
A staff member noted page references in the draft plan (section 3.5.09 / page 66 in the draft under review) that tie the comp plan to watershed plans and the Department of Ecology’s guidance; tribal leaders said active language and basin‑level detail are important for protecting salmon and groundwater resources.
Commissioners agreed to continue working collaboratively, including adding the consultant’s basin‑level table to the comp plan materials (appendix or chapter) and pursuing grants and monitoring partnerships to support offsets and streamflow work.
Next steps: County planning staff to coordinate with tribal partners to place basin tables in plan materials and to identify language that balances active commitments with legal/landowner protections; staff will continue intergovernmental coordination and pursue funding opportunities.
