St. Louis Park delays vote on Minnetonka Vista stop‑sign overhaul after heavy resident opposition

St. Louis Park City Council · December 9, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Following a staff proposal to replace many all‑way stops with an alternating 'basket weave' stop pattern, residents urged retaining four‑way stops near parks and schools. Council voted unanimously to delay action and directed staff to revisit the 2022 traffic‑sign policy.

St. Louis Park's City Council on Dec. 22 unanimously voted to delay consideration of a staff proposal to reconfigure stop controls in the Minnetonka Vista neighborhood after more than two hours of public comment from concerned residents.

Jack Sullivan, the city's assistant city engineer, told the council staff reviewed 39 internal neighborhood intersections and recommended an "alternating stop control intersection pattern" intended to reduce variability across the network. "The vast, vast majority — only about 12% — come to a complete stop" at existing signs in the study area, Sullivan said, a statistic he cited as part of the rationale for the recommended changes.

Residents rebutted the data and appealed to safety. "The proposed traffic control plan for Minnetonka Vista is dangerous and unsupported by data," said Kate Pickman, a longtime resident who cited outside studies and questioned city sampling (one 24‑hour study of four intersections). Other speakers described children waiting at neighborhood bus stops and the intersection of 39th and Joppa as a primary pedestrian route to Minnetonka Vista Park. "If the current north‑south stop at 39th and Joppa is eliminated, drivers will have three consecutive blocks without a north‑south stop sign," said Linda Jennings, who supplied written concerns and signatures for the record.

Residents raised several recurring points: that cut‑through commuter traffic routed by navigation apps would be encouraged by fewer stops; that rolling but reduced speeds at many signs still create a predictable pause that benefits children, pets and elderly pedestrians; and that the staff analysis did not include detailed pedestrian counts or longer pre/post studies at affected intersections. Multiple speakers asked for more transparent metrics on speed, volume and pedestrian exposure and for clearer monitoring and success criteria before any removals.

Sullivan said staff used three factors—stop‑sign warrants (industry standards), neighborhood predictability and community feedback—and acknowledged the proposal had generated substantial feedback. He told council staff mailed a newsletter to just under 1,000 properties and to about 2,000 email recipients, personally spoke with roughly 70 residents, and modified two locations (keeping all‑way stops at 40th & Quentin and 42nd at Princeton/Quentin because of sight‑line concerns). He also told the council that, if changes are implemented, staff would monitor speeds, volumes and crash history and consider adjustments based on the data.

A council member moved to delay the vote and direct staff to revisit the traffic‑sign policy the city adopted in 2022; the motion was seconded and later passed by voice vote. Mayor Pro Tem Bodwin closed public comment and presided over the unanimous motion to defer. "We really do value public comment," Bodwin said during the meeting, thanking residents for their turnout.

Council members who spoke during debate cited competing priorities: some emphasized the value of a citywide, predictable approach that staff described; others said local, site‑specific safety concerns—especially along 38th Street and the 39th/Joppa corridor—warranted further study and potentially different remedies such as enforcement, flashing beacons or other traffic‑calming measures. Several council members urged increased enforcement of existing stop signs as one near‑term step.

What happens next: council directed staff to revisit the 2022 policy, to return with clarifications about data, monitoring criteria and potential alternatives, and to take resident concerns into account. The council will resume consideration of the Minnetonka Vista recommendations under the revised policy process in 2026 (the motion delayed action into the next year). Staff materials and several residents' written submissions will be part of the public record.

Votes at a glance: the council approved the meeting agenda by voice vote earlier in the session and later voted unanimously to delay the Minnetonka Vista traffic‑control decision and to ask staff to revisit the 2022 traffic sign policy. No final vote was taken on rescinding or authorizing the resolutions Sullivan described; those substantive actions were deferred.