Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Right Of Way Planting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge clearer, fairer rules after notices targeting tree-lawn plantings
Summary
Several Grandview Heights residents asked council to clarify right-of-way and tree-lawn planting rules and raised concerns that notices are being sent unevenly and in response to anonymous complaints. Staff said code language is confusing and will pause enforcement while bringing recommendations this winter.
Several residents told the Grandview Heights City Council on Dec. 1 that notices to remove longstanding plantings along tree lawns have been confusing and unevenly applied, and they asked the city to revise its code and enforcement approach.
At the public-comment portion of the meeting, Mimi McKenzie of 1125 Westwood Avenue said the ordinance update in 2024 has left neighbors unclear about what is allowed and that some residents are receiving notices on a selective basis. "It seems that this ordinance around yard care appears to be extremely confusing," McKenzie said, adding that communication about the update has been inconsistent.
Rebecca Dunaway (1104 Lincoln Road) urged council to consider the community value of native and pollinator-friendly plantings, saying those gardens contribute to Grandview—s character: "What draws many people to Grandview is the nature of the planting in the yard... it brings monarch butterflies and bees." Audrey Wheeler (1066 Earlham Avenue) described similar neighborhood traditions and memories tied to tree-lawn gardens.
Cindy Byington (1346 West Avenue), who said her landscaping dates to 2004, said she received a notice and believes her plants do not obstruct sight lines. She also alleged that the complaint that triggered enforcement was made anonymously and that only some residents received notices. "Why are these and many other long established Grandview [tree-lawn] plantings a problem now?" Byington asked, and she requested clearer ordinance language and equitable application of any enforcement.
Director of Administration Roger Maxwell acknowledged that conflicting language in the city code — particularly between the planting section and the right-of-way ordinance — has caused confusion. Maxwell said notices were sent after complaints were received, that staff would use the winter months to refine recommendations, and recommended pausing enforcement while council reviews proposed clarifications. "There is some conflicting language in the code... we recommended to council that we put the enforcement in advance through the next couple of months until we could come back to you with recommendations on improvements," Maxwell said.
The council did not take formal action on the ordinance text at the Dec. 1 meeting. Director Maxwell said staff will return with clearer language and public engagement in the winter and that plant life going dormant over winter will be considered in any enforcement timing.
Next steps: staff will draft clarifications to the planting/right-of-way language and present recommended changes and public-engagement plans to council in the coming months.
